Comparing AI & advisers

Same goal, different instruments — read the mechanism, not the brochure.

This is our standing comparison. It is not a recommendation to use either route, and it is not investment advice. It is a map of how each model actually works, so you can read the one you are considering without taking its marketing at face value.

Two professionals seated across a white table, one presenting a document with a pen, in a brightly lit office

The mechanism, side by side

Both a robo-adviser and a human adviser take the same inputs — your goals, your horizon, your tolerance for loss — and both produce a portfolio. The difference is in the step between input and output.

DimensionRobo-adviserHuman adviser
How your situation is readA risk questionnaire, mapped to a model portfolioA conversation, plus documents you share
Portfolio constructionPre-built model portfolios from low-cost fundsSelected for you, often from a similar low-cost shelf
RebalancingAutomatic, on a schedule or by threshold bandsScheduled, or triggered by life events and tax planning
Behavioural coachingLimited to prompts and emailsDirect — most of the measured value sits here
Tax and account coordinationLimited; usually per-accountOften across multiple accounts and years
Typical cost (Taiwan)Low percentage of assets, sometimes a flat tierFlat fee, hourly, or a higher percentage
What it cannot seeYour real life: a pending sale, a dependent, a concentrated holdingThe instant, automatic discipline of a rule set

What neither model can promise you

No adviser and no algorithm can guarantee a return, remove market risk, or turn a short horizon into a long one. Any communication that implies otherwise — from either side — is a warning sign, not a feature. The honest comparison is about which trade-offs you are willing to accept, not about which route is superior.

Questions to ask before you choose either

  • How is the person or platform paid, and does that payment change with what they recommend?
  • What model portfolio or recommendation would I get, and what is it built from?
  • What happens on a bad day — who contacts me, and what is the default action?
  • What can this route see about my full situation, and what is it blind to?
  • What recourse do I have if something goes wrong, and where is that written down?

Common questions we receive

Is a robo-adviser safer than a human adviser?
Neither is "safer" in the sense of protecting you from market falls — both hold the same kinds of market risk. A robo-adviser reduces the risk of an undisciplined, emotional decision through automation. A human adviser reduces it through direct conversation. They manage different risks.
Can I use both at the same time?
Yes. A common arrangement is to hold the core of a portfolio with a low-cost automated platform and to pay a fee-only adviser for planning reviews on a schedule. Whether that suits you depends on the size of the portfolio and how much of your situation is non-standard.
Why do you not publish a "best robo-adviser" ranking?
Because the right answer depends on facts about you — account types, tax position, behaviour under stress — that an editorial site cannot and should not collect. A ranking would be decoration, not information.
Do you give advice if I send my details?
No. We answer editorial questions about how these models work. We do not collect enough information to advise, and we do not try to. If you want advice, we point you to where to find a licensed adviser or platform.

Where to read further

The detailed articles on each mechanism sit on the articles page. If your question is not answered there, send it to us — we answer editorial inquiries by email.